Here is a video by Gnev that shows how fornicate poor the system is. I posted my thoughts on 3-5-2 in another thread and I think it was Relly (apologies if not) that said when we have 4 at the back were exposed more and look more vulnerable
IMO, its quite the opposite and to me the best weve looked this year was against Chelsea and City when attacking and chasing the game with a 4 man defence. The same can be said for QPR at home, and away when chasing a goal, home to west ham before the 10 men. You see how much more efficient we are when playing a comfortable system
To me, we have looked good in ONE WHOLE HALF all year with the 3-5-2 and that was the first half vs spurs. The other games we have played in this system have been so fornicate dire its the worst football I have ever seen United play. It makes you long for the days of moyes where we had Mata and Young putting in 93 crosses in a game. At least in that game we created chances that we fornicate blazed over the bar. In 3-5-2 were at max getting 1 chance a game. (1 vs Arsenal, 2 vs Soton away, 0 against them at home)
As for the "our defence is so shit that 3 defenders = 2" I will argue quite the opposite. The reason they look so bad in the 3-5-2 is that they simply dont know what they are meant to be doing and how to play it. They all look fornicate lost. I actually think Chris Smalling has been quite decent this season (bar a 5 minute brain fade at city), the only problem he has is bringing the ball out of defence and making key passes, something he IS required to do in a 3 man defence and something he can avoid in a 2 man defence because he has more midfield options to give the ball to. In a 2 man defence he was brilliant vs Chelsea and wore Drogba like a glove, because it is something he is comfortable with
As for this shit defence, we have conceded the 3rd least amount of goals in the league this year, 2 more goals than the amazing Chelsea and 1 less goal than City. Yes a lot of that has to do with De Gea but the defence is the problem with the creativity we have in games and not actually defending. That spot should go to a midfielder, it fornicate us over using it on a 3rd defender
Now my biggest irk is with people saying were more vulnerable with a 2 man defence than a 3. I dont recall the supposed chances QPR created at the end of the game but I thought we were so much better equipped to a) cut out their attacks and b) attack on the counter attack with pace.
However under 3-5-2, there were periods of the game where we had 25+ passes and the 26th pass was still with the ball at the feet of Jones or Evans. So what exactly is the fornicate point? There was one passage of the play where we had 20 passes, and eventually a missed Jones pass ended up with Evans fornicate up (20 passes and the ball is still at our center backs) and with 2 (2!) passes, QPR had mustered a shot on goal that required a fornicate worldy of a save from De Gea. Not the first time this season. In fact this passage of play is the exact fornicate thing weve seen all season, it happened 8 times in one game vs Liverpool, and for further proof, look at the saves De Gea made against Arsenal and Southampton as well.
However there is a second passage of play in the game, which comes with us playing under 4-4-2, where it takes 8 passes, all of them forward and all of them positive, with center mids and full backs in the right fornicate position, that saw us create the goal. The ball eventually ended up with Rooney just outside the box (not with the ball at the feet of our centre backs 20 passes later) who played the ball to the overlapping full back (usually Rafael but in this case it was Valencia) and he played the cross into the CM making a late run into the box and he fired the ball home.
THAT is the United way. THAT is United football. NOT passing the ball between the fornicate center backs until one of them or De Gea has to boot a long ball to our forwards who are not equipped to play hold up football and bring the ball down against gorilla center backs. We play United football, not fornicate hoof ball
I admire LVG for wanting to implement his system and find a way to cover our flaws but IMO its doing the opposite. After seeing the 2 systems in action I would be fornicate flabbergasted (the use of such an extreme word is to highlight how fornicate ridiculous it would be) if we continued with this dire 3-5-2 and not go back to a 4 man defence system with Di Maria in the middle. Absolutely laughable if we dont. 3-5-2 has shown how fornicate poor it can be and how much better we play under a 4 man defence and it took 90 fornicate seconds to change the game against QPR. I dont see how anyone can argue against it and Id be fornicate amazed if LVG cant see the difference between the 2 and continues to use the 3-5-2.
Its time to go back to the United way of playing football
And heres the video of GNEV saying what I was trying to say
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Beckham... into Sheringham... and Solskjær has won it!"